Response for "Tristan and Isolde" Film

This film adaptation is devoid of the magical love potion that brings Tristan and Isolde together in the original Beroul story, changing the interpretation significantly. Both versions prompt the reader to ask a pivotal question (though based on different events): Who is really to blame for the damage Tristan's and Isolde's love causes? In Beroul's version, one could argue that the love potion's supernatural force overwhelmed the characters to a point where they could not resist each other. Therefore, readers can negate the responsibility of the lovers for carrying on their affair behind King Mark's back (and subsequently damaging his kingdom). In the movie, there is no enchantment over them; they are thus completely to blame for their adultery. The film's extraction of this plot element, in my opinion, makes the story much less engaging and challenges the audience less.
Ultimately, I found the movie’s rendition of their love for one another far inferior to that of the text. Beroul expertly crafts an alluring tale that leaves the reader questioning his or her own morals in relation to love. The text’s characters are dynamic, moving from innocent and noble to adulterous and manipulating (and even murderous). Tristan and Isolde continue their trickery after the love potion wears off, leaving the reader to ponder how in control of their lust the lovers are. Conversely, the movie provides a flat, one-dimensional, (and cliché) perspective, limiting the characters to being (likely inexcusable) "cheaters", instead of Beroul’s complex and shifting characters.